Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wp-migrate-db domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /srv/app/gotoiba-dev/htdocs/web/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
We have an account that has been dormant, but the customer did express an interest in the account via phone. The customer has a disability that prevents him from providing a written signature. Do we have to report the account as unclaimed property if we cannot obtain a written signature from the customer? – IBA Compliance Connection

We have an account that has been dormant, but the customer did express an interest in the account via phone. The customer has a disability that prevents him from providing a written signature. Do we have to report the account as unclaimed property if we cannot obtain a written signature from the customer?

by

Creating a memorandum and retaining it in your records will be sufficient to establish that the account is active. Specifically, we recommend documenting your interactions with the customer, including what was stated and by whom, account details, and the basis for your conclusion that the account is not inactive.

The Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act requires financial institutions to report and remit deposit accounts after five years of inactivity. 765 ILCS 1025/2(a) [Repealed effective 1/1/18]. However, an account will not be presumed abandoned if the owner “(3) Otherwise indicated an interest in the deposit as evidenced by a memorandum on file with the banking organization.” 765 ILCS 1025/2(a) [Repealed effective 1/1/18]. By creating and retaining a memorandum, as described above, your institution can establish that the account should not be presumed abandoned.

We also note that you may permit the customer to sign a written acknowledgement regarding the account by signing with an “X” signature or with a stamp. Illinois courts have upheld signatures by an X mark, even in the context of signing a will or trust, Bailey v. Clark, 203 Ill.App.3d 1017, 1021 (5th Dist. 1990), or signing a deed to real property, Witt v. Panek, 408 Ill. 328, 333 (1951). As stated in a recent Illinois case, “[m]arks of many different sorts may qualify as signatures, as long as the mark ‘manifests that the instrument has been executed or adopted by the party to be charged by it.’” Roti v. Roti, 364 Ill.App.3d 191, 196 (1st Dist. 2006).