Disclaimer: The Electronic Commerce Security Act (ECSA) was repealed and replaced with the Uniform Electronic Transaction Act (UETA), effective June 25, 2021. Please note that this change may affect the continued accuracy of this guidance as it pertains to the ECSA.

We do not believe that Illinois law requires financial institutions to retain hard copies of most documents, as discussed below. However, there are certain classes of documents for which it may be prudent, at a minimum, to retain hard copies. For some discussion of the risks of electronic record retention systems, this OCC advisory letter is very helpful (though we realize that your institution is not an OCC bank) — particularly the discussion of records needed for litigation, on pages 3–4. As to the time periods for retaining the documents you mentioned (notes, mortgages, and guarantees), the IBA’s Record Retention Manual recommends retaining such documents for five years after the termination of the mortgage loan. 

Illinois law does not require financial institutions to retain hard copies of most documents that are stored electronically. The Financial Institutions Electronic Documents and Digital Signature Act states that if a bank stores documents in electronic form in the regular course of business, then an electronic version of a document has “the same force and effect under the laws of this State as one comprised, recorded, or created on paper or other tangible form by writing, typing, printing, or similar means.” 205 ILCS 705/10(a). (Similarly, the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce (ESIGN) Act states that “a signature, contract, or other record . . . may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form.” 15 USC 7001(a)(1).) Under these laws, an electronic version of a note, mortgage, or guarantee should have the same effect as an original version of the document.

Note that another Illinois law, the Electronic Commerce Security Act (ECSA), regulates electronic records for all businesses (unlike the law discussed above, which applies only to financial institutions). ECSA includes the same general rule: “Information, records, and signatures shall not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely on the grounds that they are in electronic form.” 5 ILCS 175/5-110. However, that general rule does not apply to records that confer title, including negotiable instruments conferring title (such as mortgage notes) and any other “record that serves as a unique and transferable instrument of rights and obligations” (unless your electronic storage system “allows for the existence of only one unique, identifiable, and unalterable original with the functional attributes of an equivalent physical instrument, that can be possessed by only one person, and which cannot be copied except in a form that is readily identifiable as a copy”). 5 ILCS 175/5-115(b)(3) (electronic records); 5-120(c)(3) (electronic signatures); 5-125(c) (exception). Because ECSA does not apply to negotiable instruments that confer title (a category that would like include a mortgage note), we believe that a financial institution storing such records electronically would have to rely on the Financial Institutions Electronic Documents and Digital Signature Act — that law applies to any “document, representation, image, substitute check, reproduction, or combination thereof.” 205 ILCS 705/10(a).