Yes, your understanding is correct. The five transaction categories that you provided are all exceptions from the general definition of a refinancing. The general rule in Regulation Z is that a new obligation satisfying and replacing the original obligation is a refinancing requiring new disclosures. But if a transaction fits into one of the five exception categories, it is not treated as a refinancing and does not require new disclosures, even if the new obligation satisfies and replaces the original obligation.
For resources related to our guidance, please see:
-
Regulation Z, Official Interpretations, 12 CFR 1026, Section 20(a), Comment 1 (“A refinancing is a new transaction requiring a complete new set of disclosures. Whether a refinancing has occurred is determined by reference to whether the original obligation has been satisfied or extinguished and replaced by a new obligation, based on the parties' contract and applicable law. . . .”)
-
Regulation Z, Official Interpretations, 12 CFR 1026, Section 20(a), Comment 2 (“A transaction is subject to § 1026.20(a) only if it meets the general definition of a refinancing. Section 1026.20(a)(1) through (5) lists 5 events that are not treated as refinancings, even if they are accomplished by cancellation of the old obligation and substitution of a new one.”)